Skip to content
December 8, 2009 / theoldsilly

Professor Old Silly’s Tutorial Tuesday – What’s Your Point of View?

Welcome back to Bloggyversity, English class 10001.3b, “Writing With Power in Fiction.” Class, come to order, please, we have a very important subject to go over today, and I have not a bit of patience for your normal shenanigans. Stop throwing spitballs, turn off your ipods, cell phones, blackberries, etc., desist with google-eying members of the opposite sex, adjust you monitors and undies and have a prompt seat.

Thank you. Ahem. Let’s begin with today’s subject.

One thing I’ve noticed while editing manuscripts lately is the lack of understanding of the all important Point Of View (POV). It is one of those elements of masterful writing that separates the amateurs from the professionals. What is POV?  It boils down to whose head you’re in. Which character’s emotions and feelings you’re going to have the reader experience.  It’s a powerful tool in any writer’s toolbox, and has a dramatic effect when one understands and uses it correctly.

There are three types of POV commonly used in fiction: omniscient, first person, and third person.  Omniscient POV is told from the viewpoint of the writer, or, you might even say, of God.  The author knows, and the reader is allowed to see and know, everything; nothing is hidden.  Here is an example: John walked away with a smile on his face. Little did he know it would be the last smile he would have for a long, long time.

The author, in that passage, let’s us know not only what John does not know, think or feel, but indicates a knowledge of the future … clearly stuff reserved for “god-consciousness’, hmm?”

Omniscient POV has its advantages, it makes it quite easy to introduce backstory, to give the reader a good sense of the place, time, atmosphere, setting, and etc. On the downside, it is a rather sterile way of writing. It does not allow the reader to get inside the heads and hearts of the characters, to feel with them as they move through the story. The characters are viewed from an impartial distance. Also, since the reader sees and knows everything, who is thinking what and who is doing what at all times, it is much more difficult to build suspense. Omniscient POV was used a great deal in the nineteenth century, but it is seldom used in popular contemporary novels.

Next, we have first person POV. Now you are only in one person’s point of view, and that being the main character – the one telling the story. You, the author, use “I” when spinning your tale. For example: I felt crucified. My gut tensed as she cursed and shouted foul threats at me that I felt would tear my soul apart.

The primary advantage to first person POV is, you are right inside the head and skin and emotional makeup of the main character. It can be extremely immediate and compelling. You get to live, breathe and feel the story right along with him or her. Of course, the more interesting the character you’ve created, the better in this respect. The downside to first person POV is that everything you, the reader, learn about the plot and story, you must learn through that character’s experience. This takes great skill as a writer. The reader is only getting one side of the story. While this technique can be used effectively in certain types of mysteries and/or romances, those where the author only wants the reader to know one perspective in an attempt to build more suspense and tension, it is generally not recommended for stories where the author wants the reader to have insight into all their important characters’ true feelings and/or motivations  – not limited to just the main character.

Third person POV is the most often used and popular today by fiction writers. Here is an example of third person: John felt crucified. His gut tensed as Mary cursed and shouted foul threats at him that he felt would tear his soul apart.

Now we are in John’s POV.  You know that because I’ve told us what he’s experiencing, feeling and thinking.  In third person POV, you can stay in one character’s viewpoint, and/or just as easily switch from one to another – the perfect compromise between omniscient and first person. You have more than one viewpoint at your disposal as a writer, creating balance with relative ease, with the added benefit of being able to get inside the heads of individual characters.

But don’t throw away omniscient POV. It does have its place and purpose in good prose. Though seldom used to write entire novels these days, occasionally in can be used to good effect to begin a story, giving the reader a good sense of time and place, as we discussed above. However, once all that’s been established, it is advised that the writer switch to third person, and get lodged into one character’s viewpoint.

Picture an opening scene. A helicopter is zooming over a large city, a city imperiled by war, and gunmen are peering out the open side of the chopper. The camera follows the chopper as it swoops over a certain neighborhood. Shouts and shots fill the air. People are screaming and running. The chopper fires a bomb and flies off as the explosion sounds. The camera zooms in for a close-up of a mother holding her little baby, whose husband has just been severely wounded by flying shrapnel. She screams and calls out to anyone who can hear, “Help! Help me – my husband is bleeding!”

We are now firmly in the distraught woman’s POV.

Now there are several things to keep in mind while writing in third person POV. For one, the sooner you let the reader know whose head they’re in, the better. And it’s easy. Just tell the reader the character’s feelings. Here’s an example: After Mary had left, John felt as though he’d fallen off a cliff emotionally. He held his head and cried, thinking, god how far my life has fallen.

There is no doubt whose head we are in, hmm? No. From anyone else’s POV, we could not know what John felt and thought, unless it is through dialog and/or the descriptions and suppositions of other characters.

One more thing to watch for with third person POV and then we’ll dismiss blog – this lesson is getting a bit long and I know you kids – probably thinking about partying and/or sex by now. But bear with me, okay? This is important.

When in third person, you can only tell the reader what the character that you are inside the head of is experiencing. This is a common mistake I see a lot. For instance, what’s wrong with this short segment?

John felt woozy. Too much to drink, he thought, moaning, as he clutched at his churning stomach. His head and the entire room started spinning. He leaned over a table and vomited, then passed out, dropping his drink. The goblet crashed to the hardwood, shattering into fine shards of glass and splattering Long Island all over the floor.

Did you catch my error? The last sentence. How would John know what happened to the drink? He’s already passed out. I switched to omniscient POV and told you, the reader, what happened next. This is a no-no. I should have had another character observe and comment on what happened to the drink if I wanted you to know that.

Okay, ahm – there’s more to cover on this topic, and we’ll get back to it in a later blog class. When and how often it is appropriate to switch POV’s, that sort of thing and more. But right now I can tell you’re all antsy to get going and finish your blog-hopping, so – thank you, class, oh – and class?

Class?

Sigh, off to the teacher’s lounge for warm milk and cookies. Nobody cares anymore, it seems. Now that I think of it, a nice stiff Long Island would be better.

~~~~~

Click on Tweety Bird and Tweet this post if you liked it!

Tweet Me from The Old Silly's Free Spirit Blog

22 Comments

Leave a Comment
  1. Crystal Clear Proofing / Dec 8 2009 7:17 am

    This is an excellent post, my friend! Very often overlooked or simply not thought about!

    • theoldsilly / Dec 8 2009 10:51 am

      Thanks, Crystal, quite the compliment coming from YOU. ;)

  2. Cactus Annie / Dec 8 2009 10:11 am

    Wow – I never had that explained to me before. I think I actually UNDERSTAND now! ;)

  3. John Standish / Dec 8 2009 10:25 am

    I always enjoy these tutorials even though I’m not a writer. As a book lover, though, it helps me understand why some books read better than others. Nice job today, old silly – I GOT it!

  4. Barbra Kelser / Dec 8 2009 10:33 am

    Very clear lesson today, old silly. So where do I sign up for Bloggyversity? lol

  5. quirkyloon / Dec 8 2009 10:48 am

    “On the downside, it is a rather sterile way of writing.”

    You have no heart.

    Just cuz I’m sterile in my writing and in real life is no reason for you to call me out.

    *sob*

    Now please stop using me and my writing as your inspirations for these posts?

    Please?

    The Diet Dr. Pepper can fell off the table, it’s contents oozing on the rug.

    (Ha?)

    • theoldsilly / Dec 8 2009 10:53 am

      See Quirkster? You’re learning already! LOL, your zany blog posts are ANYthing but sterile. ;) I mean, what with all the zombies and Diet Dr. Pepper oozing all over the place!

  6. Stanley Berber / Dec 8 2009 11:04 am

    I’ll join you for the Long Island, Marv! LOL – hey good tutorial – cleared some things up for me.

  7. tdryden1 / Dec 8 2009 11:07 am

    I wish I knew this before hand!!! I never thought of it that way. I need to sign up for the entire, fun filled classes… You are such a great help. I’ll learn, I promise but remember, I’m old and such a slow learner!!! (haha). Bear with me!

    Thanks for the great blog!!!

    • theoldsilly / Dec 8 2009 11:14 am

      You’re so very welcome, but – you’re not getting older, Terri – just getting better! :)

      • tdryden1 / Dec 9 2009 10:31 am

        haha, I hope I get better! After reading all my mistakes I’m not so sure!!! Just a little overwhelming!!!
        Hopefully, I’ll get it… I really want it!

  8. Karen Walker / Dec 8 2009 11:20 am

    This is so very clear, Marvin. Clearer than anything I heard while attending university classes a few years ago. Thanks so very much.
    Karen

  9. ReformingGeek / Dec 8 2009 11:34 am

    Whoa! Wait! This is too deep for me. Maybe it’s because I’m worn out today. Cat has the right idea, sleeping off a hard night of….sleeping.

    Thanks for the advice, Marvin!

  10. Elizabeth Spann Craig / Dec 8 2009 11:40 am

    Clear and concise, Marvin!

    Thanks for the POV refresher…

    Elizabeth
    Mystery Writing is Murder

  11. Elspeth Antonelli / Dec 8 2009 12:48 pm

    I’ve written in first person for a short story and my WIP is in third. It is tricky to remember you can’t jump out of their head into events the character wouldn’t know. I’m doing my best. Thanks for the very clear lesson!

    Elspeth

  12. Patricia Stoltey / Dec 8 2009 1:12 pm

    POV is one of the hardest things for beginning writers to understand — on Saturday, I made a return visit to one of the critique groups I started, and the topic of POV dominated the Q&A time.

    As a reader, I’ve developed a big prejudice against omniscient POV because I like being in one character’s head at a time. I found that some writers confuse my comments about omniscient point of view with multiple point of view and think I’m saying multiple POV is not acceptable. Absolutely wrong! As long as the writer keeps each POV character’s scene or chapter totally separate from the next, I love it. Omnisicient, however, not so much.

    Thanks for another helpful post on the topic, Marvin.

  13. ZZ / Dec 8 2009 2:11 pm

    Lovely post, Professor MM! Good examples and I like that you didn’t demonize any particular point of view even while pointing out the difficulties in each one. I love writing in first person and SO many people just think it’s evil…

    • theoldsilly / Dec 8 2009 5:49 pm

      Thanks, Zeez – and having read one of your novels I can attest to your good abilities in writing in 1st person POV. ;)

  14. L. Diane Wolfe / Dec 8 2009 2:18 pm

    Another great post!

    I favor the third person. And like that example passage, it becomes a fun challenge to go back through and make sure none of that exists! I make sure the story is viewed only from my two main characters (I always seem to select just two) and doesn’t hop between them, either.

    Guess that could be a whole ‘nother lesson!

    • theoldsilly / Dec 8 2009 5:50 pm

      Yep, and that lesson is comin’ up here soon. ;)

  15. Helen Ginger / Dec 8 2009 4:54 pm

    Very good class, Marvin. And great examples.

    Helen
    Straight From Hel

  16. Marcus Franks / Dec 8 2009 5:56 pm

    You know, if I had had an English Comp teacher with as much humor as you, I might have paid more attention and become a writer – lol. Good tutorial, I understood it and had fun reading it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>